Join Today
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 176
  1. #101
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Well since the last up date I had the dreaded MOT to take of and lucky enough the old girl passed, it even passed the emissions

    I entered the conversion factor that I was sure was the right one and bingo, I had boost, or I did until at full boost the engine cut out and refused to start at the side of the motorway, lucky enough I carry a spare ostrich and the car started with it. Did what I needed to do and went home. I put the original ostrich back in and when turning the ignition on the radiator fan kicked in but the engine wouldn't start, reloaded the bin file that was on the ostrich and it fired up and ran fine.

    Name:  8-12-18a cutout.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  284.3 KB

    I remember some saying that the TCV load set point had to be altered when using the 608 bin file on a 2.5ltr and I've noticed that my logged values are way out from the ones in the bin file. So I've raised the values in the lower throttle positions.

    Name:  8-12-18 cutout.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  309.4 KB

    Name:  new tcv values.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  399.0 KB

    When we had some colder weather The old girl would run VERY rich when first firing up and would then run fine after 5 minutes. So I've got some new warm up tables which will help it run better on start up, just need some cold weather.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by oblark; Saturday 8th December 2018 at 19:40.

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to oblark For This Useful Post:

    kmb (Monday 10th December 2018)

  3. #102
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    I had that issue before where the fan and some other ancillaries run when the ignition is turned on. It turned out to be a problem with the eprom chip connections in it's socket.

    So with yours having the ostrich there may have been an issue with the ostrich. Wonder if it's to do with the battery on the ostrich board?
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  4. #103
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Just had a look through a 2.5 binary and the acceleration enrichment and warmup maps are quite different to the 2.3 binary.

    The acceleration is a fair bit lower
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  5. #104
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dangerous Dave View Post
    Just had a look through a 2.5 binary and the acceleration enrichment and warmup maps are quite different to the 2.3 binary.

    The acceleration is a fair bit lower
    Are you able to pm a 2.5 bin file ?

    Thanks.

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  6. #105
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Here ya go mate, its the 609 binary (my current ecu is a 609 taken from a V70 AWD 2.5):
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/mwnf0k1vgl...880_1.BIN?dl=0

    The maps are in a different location to the 608 binary.

    1st acceleration enrichment - CDC6
    2nd acceleration enrichment - CE46
    afterstart enrichment - D7D6

    To be honest there are loads of different maps (not just fuelling) between the 2.3 and the 2.5. I'm looking at converting the 609 binary to run the logging and streaming as I'm getting more uncertain about running the 608 on the 2.5.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  7. #106
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Thanks for the 609 bin file, I've had a look at the acceleration enrichment DK and K+L from your 609 bin and when compared to my 608 bin file they are the same. But the afterstart enrichment is way different, not sure if I'm using the right XDF file.

    Name:  acceleration enrichment for 2.5.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  315.4 KB

    Name:  afterstart enrichment 2.5.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  247.1 KB

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  8. #107
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Is that after you've changed the values in you acceleration enrichment tables?

    It looks like the wrong address for the afterstart enrichment, should be D7D6 according to the damos and WinOLS
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  9. #108
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    I didn't get around to lowering any of the acceleration enrichment tables as the weather warmed up.

    Here are the 2.3 & 2.5 acceleration enrichment tables as I see them.

    Name:  2.3 & 2.5 acceleration enrichment.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  340.7 KB

    As for the Afterstart enrichment I think I've got it right now.

    Name:  hex view D7D6.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  383.8 KB

    Name:  2.5 afterstart enrichment.png
Views: 0
Size:  118.1 KB

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  10. #109
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    I've got some different values for the 2.5 (609 binary and my 850 awd (305) binary) acceleration enrichment. *****Note the different rpm and temp ranges (I've checked they are right)



    Yeah that's the right afterstart enrichment address. Conversion formula for afterstart enrichment is X*0.03125. Here are the 608 and 609 compared. Again note the different temp range.



    But then the deceleration maps are different and the wall film maps and so on too
    Last edited by Dangerous Dave; Thursday 13th December 2018 at 01:14.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  11. #110
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    I've got different acceleration enrichment for K&L and DK in the 609 bin. But at last my afterstart enrichment matches yours

    Name:  609 acceleration enrichment.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  189.9 KB

    What conversion factor are have you got for the acceleration enrichment ?

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  12. #111
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    K&L - X*0.0625 (1:16)
    DK - X*0.125 (1:8)

    I've checked the two acceleration enrichment maps against my awd 305 binary and a later 765 (also 2.5) binary and they are all the same, so looks like they didn't update/optimise them further
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  13. #112
    Gearbox Killer
    Proving the power of the
    15g....13.4@104.3mph
    MoleT-5R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mid-Wales
    Posts
    5,624
    Thanks
    2,798
    Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,797 Posts
    Interesting stuff, it just seems a mile over my head at present....lol....keep up the good work guys

    Current Volvo's 1995 854 Gul T-5R 1996 855 Olive T-5R 1997 855 Olive AWD 1999 V70R AWD and 2005 XC90 D5 AWD
    Previous Volvo's 1987 745 gle 1989 745 GL 1995 855 Olive GLE 2001 V70 p2
    My Ebay Items http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/quik.connection

  14. #113
    Senior Member
    Appreciative
    kmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Suffolk & Rhone Alpes
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks
    926
    Thanked 455 Times in 375 Posts
    Over my head too, but I like to read and glean a small insight

  15. #114
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Read the early posts in the tuners rejoice thread over on Volvospeed, lots of assembly language and info to get lost in
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Dangerous Dave For This Useful Post:

    kmb (Sunday 16th December 2018)

  17. #115
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Finally my 609 bin acceleration enrichment match yours I had DK and K+L hex addresses the wrong way around.

    Name:  609 acceleration enrichment1.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  177.7 KB

    As the 609 K+L table has lower values I can see if the 608 K+L was set to the 609 values it would help the rich idling at start up as Aaron said I need to lower the acceleration enrichment but the 609 DK values are higher than the 608 values which I thought would make it run even richer.
    Do you think it would work if the complete 609 K+L table including the rpm and temps in the 608 bin file ?

    Can you have a look in the 608 bin for hex address CFA4 and find out what the conversion factor is ?

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  18. #116
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Cool I don't know what the DK and K+L abbreviations actually mean (yet) but I intend to run those maps on mine to see if it makes a difference to these cold morning starts. Also going to change CE06 (8x8 K+L deceleration X*0.0625) and CE86 (8x8 DK deceleration X*0.125). I had an issue with mine the other day flashing the MIL whilst decelerating in gear with foot off throttle (load was approx 1)

    Conversion factor for CFA4 and CFE6 (both 8x8 'wall film' maps I think) is X*0.003906. Again the RPM and temp ranges are the same as the other 609 8x8 maps.

    Ah found and explanation of the DK and K+L:
    http://volvospeed.com/vs_forum/topic...omment=2424959
    Last edited by Dangerous Dave; Friday 14th December 2018 at 23:36.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  19. #117
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    After reading Boxman's article I think altering the acceleration enrichment is not the answer to the rich idling in cold temps.

    "If I turned off DK entirely, upon slamming the throttle, AFR would blip lean followed by rich before settling. Turn DK up, and this initial lean blip will turn rich. Increasing the values, of course, meant richer."

    I think lowering the afterstart enrichment is the answer but I'm in two minds about that.

    At zero degrees the 608 bin is - 2.125 and the 609 bin is - 3.125

    To me the 608 bin is leaner as the value is closer to zero.

    CFA4 is another acceleration enrichment table but I'm unsure what CFE6 is.

    On another note had a terrible day, I think the wideband sensor has died, the car starts ok but as it warms up the AFR's climb from 13.4 to 18+ and you can hear the fact it's running lean in the exhaust note. Lucky I had my laptop with me so I loaded a map with the wideband turned off to get me back home ( exhaust note as per normal ). On the way home in the poring rain the car seamed to be "loose" and the back and make a banging noise, got home to find I had flat. So the car is going to get a early Christmas present of 2 new rear tyre.

    Name:  flat.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  177.7 KB

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  20. #118
    Gearbox Killer
    Proving the power of the
    15g....13.4@104.3mph
    MoleT-5R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mid-Wales
    Posts
    5,624
    Thanks
    2,798
    Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,797 Posts
    Would the dying wideband sensor have added to afr issues, as you may not have had accurate data to base your changes upon...?

    P.s. sorry to see the tyre died, bet you covered a fair distance before you found it flat.
    Last edited by MoleT-5R; Sunday 16th December 2018 at 10:43. Reason: P.s.

    Current Volvo's 1995 854 Gul T-5R 1996 855 Olive T-5R 1997 855 Olive AWD 1999 V70R AWD and 2005 XC90 D5 AWD
    Previous Volvo's 1987 745 gle 1989 745 GL 1995 855 Olive GLE 2001 V70 p2
    My Ebay Items http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/quik.connection

  21. #119
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by oblark View Post
    After reading Boxman's article I think altering the acceleration enrichment is not the answer to the rich idling in cold temps.

    "If I turned off DK entirely, upon slamming the throttle, AFR would blip lean followed by rich before settling. Turn DK up, and this initial lean blip will turn rich. Increasing the values, of course, meant richer."

    I think lowering the afterstart enrichment is the answer but I'm in two minds about that.

    At zero degrees the 608 bin is - 2.125 and the 609 bin is - 3.125

    To me the 608 bin is leaner as the value is closer to zero.

    CFA4 is another acceleration enrichment table but I'm unsure what CFE6 is.
    Yeah thats right lower is leaner. It seems the DK is an instant sort of enrichment map to stop it going lean then rich then lean when you accelerate. Then the K+L does the longer term stuff from what he's saying. Though he says he slammed the throttle so there may be a limit from where these maps are used which means they won't have as much impact.

    I'm gonna try it, see if it makes any difference.

    Sorry, I meant CFA4 and CFE4 (not CFE6 sorry) are both 'wall film' maps in the 608 (CEC6 and CF06 in the 609 binary) all 8x8 maps
    CFA4 is 'wall film' map for acceleration enrichment and CFE4 is 'wall film' map for deceleration enrichment. Again these are quite different in the 609
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  22. #120
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MoleT-5R View Post
    Would the dying wideband sensor have added to afr issues, as you may not have had accurate data to base your changes upon...?

    P.s. sorry to see the tyre died, bet you covered a fair distance before you found it flat.
    After loading a few different bin files I came to the conclusion it was the AEM gauge/controller that was faulty. To change the gauge/controller I ended up changing the loom to the sensor and the sensor. Time will tell if the old gauge was giving me inaccurate AFR data readings.

    The tyre was about 6 years old and done 12-15k miles. The reason for the flat was 2 splits and a handful of bulges in the inner sidewall.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dangerous Dave View Post
    Yeah thats right lower is leaner. It seems the DK is an instant sort of enrichment map to stop it going lean then rich then lean when you accelerate. Then the K+L does the longer term stuff from what he's saying. Though he says he slammed the throttle so there may be a limit from where these maps are used which means they won't have as much impact.

    I'm gonna try it, see if it makes any difference.
    I'll try the afterstart enrichment and report back if you want to report back on what effects the acceleration enrichment has on start up.

    Does raising the deacceleration table make it run rich on deacceleration ? ( just wondering if that would make it pop and bang on deacceleration )

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
ipv6 ready