Join Today
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 186
  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Still more fettling needed,
    will it never end?
    stribo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tadley
    Posts
    13,326
    Thanks
    2,620
    Thanked 4,587 Times in 3,404 Posts
    Cool, rather him than me.

  2. #42
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Quick upadte,

    The ECU and ostrich 2.0 came back from Avinitlarge.



    The EPROM chip has been removed and the ostrich installed in it`s place.



    With the ostrich I now can save any changes to the map direct to the ecu instead of saving to the PC then flashing it the ECU

    The next things to be connected to the ECU will be the wideband AFR, oil pressure sensor and oil temp sensor.

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oblark For This Useful Post:

    stribo (Thursday 17th April 2014),theflyingbrick (Friday 18th April 2014)

  4. #43
    Senior Member
    Blah Blah Blah!
    Volvostorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Condover
    Posts
    4,124
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 917 Times in 807 Posts
    Looking good that, I'm watching this with interest




  5. #44
    Senior Member
    Still more fettling needed,
    will it never end?
    stribo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tadley
    Posts
    13,326
    Thanks
    2,620
    Thanked 4,587 Times in 3,404 Posts
    Looks like you're getting on top of this remapping malarkey, fair play.

  6. #45
    Gearbox Killer
    Proving the power of the
    15g....13.4@104.3mph
    MoleT-5R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mid-Wales
    Posts
    5,624
    Thanks
    2,798
    Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,797 Posts
    nice work Rob, the ostrich really reduces the work load re-mapping, so re-mapping on the hoof is almost reality for 4.4 then???

    Current Volvo's 1995 854 Gul T-5R 1996 855 Olive T-5R 1997 855 Olive AWD 1999 V70R AWD and 2005 XC90 D5 AWD
    Previous Volvo's 1987 745 gle 1989 745 GL 1995 855 Olive GLE 2001 V70 p2
    My Ebay Items http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/quik.connection

  7. #46
    Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Rotherham, South Yorkshire
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MoleT5-R View Post
    nice work Rob, the ostrich really reduces the work load re-mapping, so re-mapping on the hoof is almost reality for 4.4 then???
    Yep, the ostrich make life SO much quicker and easier. The old way took over 2 mins to write the full file, with the ostrich, a second or 2. The big plus is, if you make 1 minor change, you dont have to write the full binary.
    1997 V70R FWD Manual

    608 Modded ECU with Ostrich 2.0, COP Conversion, ITG Filter, 3.5" MAF, 3" intake, 18t turbo, Do88 Intercooler, RIP, 3" TB, 750cc EV14 injectors, AEM 320 Fuel Pump, 3" Cat back, Spartan2 Wideband

    Lowered 40mm, Poly Subframe inserts

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Avinitlarge For This Useful Post:

    MoleT-5R (Saturday 19th April 2014)

  9. #47
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts


    Guess what I`m doing on bank holiday Monday ?

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  10. #48
    Senior Member
    Keeping it looking stock
    Harvey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Newton abbot, Devon
    Posts
    5,567
    Thanks
    920
    Thanked 1,581 Times in 1,296 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by oblark View Post


    Guess what I`m doing on bank holiday Monday ?
    I Guess lying on the floor getting wet. Nice something else to watch when you going flat out.

  11. #49
    Senior Member
    Still more fettling needed,
    will it never end?
    stribo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tadley
    Posts
    13,326
    Thanks
    2,620
    Thanked 4,587 Times in 3,404 Posts
    Nice bit of kit, hoping to get one myself soon.

  12. #50
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Been going through hours of data logging and I`m starting to get my head around this remapping

    As you can see from the two screenshots the I`m running really close to the figures in the map.

    TCV set point.

    Name:  TCV-setpoint.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  304.1 KB

    TCV duty cycle.

    Name:  TCV-duty-cycle.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  313.1 KB

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  13. #51
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Here`s the standard 850R MAF along side the BMW 540i MAF



    And here is BMW MAF with the 850R sensor installed.


    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to oblark For This Useful Post:

    MoleT-5R (Thursday 29th May 2014)

  15. #52
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Wow, quite a difference when they're side by side
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  16. #53
    Cookie Monster
    its getting there
    theflyingbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    east london
    Posts
    2,602
    Thanks
    1,820
    Thanked 813 Times in 601 Posts
    wow that's some girth you got there


    full respray..plenty of body mods..comets..ray cat back noise pipe..decat and wrapped downpipe..me7 exhaust manifold..3" throttle body with ported inlet manifold..blue injectors..adjustable fuel reg..reverse intercooler pipework..19t..open cone air filter..255 fuel pump..m-r-p short shift..boost gauge..unknown remap..adjustable suspension..lightweight crank pulley..n/a cams..stripped out interior..and a heavy right foot

  17. #54
    Gearbox Killer
    Proving the power of the
    15g....13.4@104.3mph
    MoleT-5R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mid-Wales
    Posts
    5,624
    Thanks
    2,798
    Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,797 Posts
    My brain is fried just trying to keep up with your progress Rob, great thread keep it up

    Current Volvo's 1995 854 Gul T-5R 1996 855 Olive T-5R 1997 855 Olive AWD 1999 V70R AWD and 2005 XC90 D5 AWD
    Previous Volvo's 1987 745 gle 1989 745 GL 1995 855 Olive GLE 2001 V70 p2
    My Ebay Items http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/quik.connection

  18. #55
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    I’ve loaded some new values onto the ecu and logged the results, I now have a STFT that goes from – 14 to +14 but the LTFT_PL is still at +25 and generating a fault code.

    One thing that has been bothering me is that the logged air flow is not the same as the air flow in the maf editor.

    When idling at 750 rpm with 3.25” maf bin file I’m logging 2-3 KG/HR less than what the maf editor says it should be, also the difference between logged and maf editor values gets greater as the air flow increases. The readings I`m getting are closer to 3” maf so I loaded a 3”maf bin file and tried that and I’m logging 2-3 KG/HR less than the values in the 3” maf editor.

    For example, 0.588v = 15.75 KG/HR but I`m logging at 0.588v = 13.125
    So the ecu is fuelling for 15.75kg/hr but they is only 13.125kg/hr of air.
    As the air flow increases the difference between calculated and actual air flow increases to a point where I’ve logged a 40 kg/hr difference.
    With that I thought it would be running rich but it’s running lean at part load or I’m I barking up the wrong tree.

    As I was getting no where with that I tried lifting the maf out of the housing by 2 m/m and logged the values with the 3.25” bin file, I’m now with in 0.5-1 KG/HR of the values in the maf editor at 750 rpm and 1500 rpm.

    I will try and go for a good run tomorrow to see if the LTFT_PL comes down.

    !00 points and a mars bar to who ever can sort this little problem out

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  19. #56
    Senior Member
    Still more fettling needed,
    will it never end?
    stribo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tadley
    Posts
    13,326
    Thanks
    2,620
    Thanked 4,587 Times in 3,404 Posts
    Sorry, that was all gibberish to me, which is why I won't be doing my own mapping.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to stribo For This Useful Post:

    p fandango (Thursday 17th July 2014)

  21. #57
    Randomly Typed Username
    Iraq Lobster
    jamesy12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    lives on Standard Row
    Posts
    7,389
    Thanks
    4,606
    Thanked 3,343 Times in 2,497 Posts
    Scaling factor for MAF output correct? It's 0.0196 according to some stuff I have about M4.4. Maybe this needs to be different for a bigger MAF?

    Both lambda sensors working?

  22. #58
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stribo View Post
    Sorry, that was all gibberish to me, which is why I won't be doing my own mapping.
    It was to me 6 months ago but it proves you can teach a old dog new tricks

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesy12345 View Post
    Scaling factor for MAF output correct? It's 0.0196 according to some stuff I have about M4.4. Maybe this needs to be different for a bigger MAF?

    Both lambda sensors working?
    The scaling for the 3.25" maf over the standard maf is 1.94 using the maf editor I`ve got. My one and only O2 sensor is brand new

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,

  23. #59
    Senior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 356 Times in 276 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by oblark View Post
    I’ve loaded some new values onto the ecu and logged the results, I now have a STFT that goes from – 14 to +14 but the LTFT_PL is still at +25 and generating a fault code.

    One thing that has been bothering me is that the logged air flow is not the same as the air flow in the maf editor.

    When idling at 750 rpm with 3.25” maf bin file I’m logging 2-3 KG/HR less than what the maf editor says it should be, also the difference between logged and maf editor values gets greater as the air flow increases. The readings I`m getting are closer to 3” maf so I loaded a 3”maf bin file and tried that and I’m logging 2-3 KG/HR less than the values in the 3” maf editor.

    For example, 0.588v = 15.75 KG/HR but I`m logging at 0.588v = 13.125
    So the ecu is fuelling for 15.75kg/hr but they is only 13.125kg/hr of air.
    As the air flow increases the difference between calculated and actual air flow increases to a point where I’ve logged a 40 kg/hr difference.
    With that I thought it would be running rich but it’s running lean at part load or I’m I barking up the wrong tree.

    As I was getting no where with that I tried lifting the maf out of the housing by 2 m/m and logged the values with the 3.25” bin file, I’m now with in 0.5-1 KG/HR of the values in the maf editor at 750 rpm and 1500 rpm.

    I will try and go for a good run tomorrow to see if the LTFT_PL comes down.

    !00 points and a mars bar to who ever can sort this little problem out

    I don`t understand the figures either ....but looking at it logically which this may be the reason for the wrong or expected figures!........

    The pic. of the 850R MAF the sensor part which reads the volume of air is in the centre of the MAF which it has to be to read the volume correctly also the design of the sensor with it`s thicker holder would of been calculated into the equation as it will effect the volume of air going past.

    The pic. of the BMW MAF holder with the Volvo sensor in, the sensor is not in the centre of the holder so therefore you won`t get a proper reading of volume!

    Also if you compare the Youtube pic. of the BMW MAF holder with it`s own sensor you will see although the pic. is on an angle the sensor is in the centre of the holder and is extremely thin to avoid any loss of volume of air going past and also will read the volume accurately.

    I think the reason it is lean is because the 850R sensor is off centre in the BMW holder and so it is only capable of reading less but more air is going past due to it`s diameter.


    Can you not use the BMW sensor or are the electrical ohms etc different or if you have a spare 850 sensor try modifying to go deeper into the holder to be central and also trim some plastic off it?

    Good Luck

    ......................................
    Attached Images Attached Images    


    Mercedes C320CDI Sport Estate 3 litre V6 7 Gear Auto
    Remap 290bhp 628Nm torque @ 1600revs 45.1mpg

  24. #60
    Ghost Rider
    If I want your opinion, I'll
    ask you to fill out the
    necessary forms
    oblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Romsey, Hampshire
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    982
    Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,186 Posts
    I understand where you are coming from with the 850 sensor not being in the middle of the housing. The formula that I`m using with the maf editor software take in to account that the 850 sensor is not in the middle of the housing.

    When I moved the sensor even more away from the centre of the housing my kg/hr readings where closer to the values in the maf editor software.

    1996 850 T5 AWD - Self tuned M4.4 ECU with COP`s, B5254T ( S60R internals in a 850 block ) ostrich 2.0 , VXR injectors @ 3.8 bar, K24 turbo with a 6+6 compressor wheel, 3.25" MAF, top mounted Dump Valve, RN Exhaust manifold, 3" downpipe with 200 cell cat, 2.75" Stainless exhaust, Brembo calipers, S60R brake discs, stainless RIP kit, 3" Throttle body,


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
ipv6 ready