Join Today
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 67
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    fassi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts

    S60 2.4T 200bhp AFR befor and after remap

    Hello everyone
    Planning to remap my 2.4T what could give me about 30bhp extra.
    Before doing it want to make sure that engine is running fine.
    What i've noticed is that in hard acceleration AFR stays in between 14.2-14.5,
    lambda 0.98-0.92. I have factory fited wideband O2 sensor and ECU stays in CL all the way up.
    Is that correct AFR in hard acceleration for this engine, which is B5244T3.
    I bought new MAF, there is no faults, fuel trims seems to be ok, O2 sensor switches (avg 1 at idle, AFR 14.6-14.7)
    Planning to visit HLM, but before that i want to make sure that there is everything fine with the engine.
    Many thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts
    Not sure about your readings but your engine has major potential depending how deep your pockets are
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    fassi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    To be honest i spoke to 2 Volvo specialists and no one gave me satisfying answer, looked like they have no idea whats correct AFR for this engine.
    If thats correct AFR its possible to achieve quite a lot by remapping the ECU which means to get the engine running rich lets say AFR about 11.
    As far as i know max i can get by remapping is about 30-35bhp and 60-70NM of torque.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts
    Well, from what I've learned here, with a bigger turbo, bigger injectors and then a remap (plus a few other bits and bobs) you'd be looking at a 100hp increase. Like I said, depends on your budget. Hamish at HLM will be able to give you a definitive answer regarding your readings. From what I've read about HLM, they won't just throw a map at it and send you on your way.
    I'm hoping to head up there myself, funds permitting.
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    fassi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    My S60 is FWD so im not sure if its worth to put so much power on just 2 wheels. i reckon 4WD would make sens.
    Definitely will give this guys call, very interested what they gonna say about AFR.

  6. #6
    Demented Tonka Toy
    This user has no status
    t5_monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    6,222
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked 1,758 Times in 1,256 Posts
    It's daft to get a 2.4 T and tune the arse outta that.

    You'd be better off just going with a remap and enjoying 230bhp of lag free surge

    or get a T5.....


    you'll be ok up to about 350bhp if you get a quaife... any more and it could get interesting... depends if you like getting a workout when you drive or not
    Last edited by t5_monkey; Sunday 1st January 2012 at 22:09.

    BSR stage 3, BSR Stainless Exhaust, Vibratechnics gearbox Mount, OZ 17" Superturismo Alloys, Bell FMIC, LED Side lights, LED interior Lights, Tinted Windows, Eibach Sports Springs, K&N Air Intake, 3" Sports Cat and Downpipe, Debadged, EST Strut Brace, EST Grille, Black Moose Stickers, Bilstein B8 Dampers, Fully Polybushed, CC3 all round, CF Wingmirrors
    Release the Monkey inside of you >>> Trunk Monkey

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fassi1 View Post
    Hello everyone
    Planning to remap my 2.4T what could give me about 30bhp extra.
    Before doing it want to make sure that engine is running fine.
    What i've noticed is that in hard acceleration AFR stays in between 14.2-14.5,
    lambda 0.98-0.92. I have factory fited wideband O2 sensor and ECU stays in CL all the way up.
    Is that correct AFR in hard acceleration for this engine, which is B5244T3.
    I bought new MAF, there is no faults, fuel trims seems to be ok, O2 sensor switches (avg 1 at idle, AFR 14.6-14.7)
    Planning to visit HLM, but before that i want to make sure that there is everything fine with the engine.
    Many thanks.
    yours is a low pressure turbo i would say but them afrs seem to be on the lean side to me but when you go to hamish at hlm he will sort all that out for you and the remap will sort any other issues out with the car.the 30 bhp extra is very conservative they normally produce more.and because you are running a small turbo the will be no lag and will go like stink mate.get the map done you wont be disapointed.also hamish always does a run on the rollers before and after so that will show the genuine afrs the car is producing before and after the remap.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts
    Wouldn't a better turbo and map turn it into a T5 any way? The older T5s are 250bhp with a smaller cc and a dull map (i know) and an S60 won't be as lairy as a S40 with with the same power due to the extra weight and wider stantz.
    I recon, after the remap, the bug may well bite .
    Above all, enjoy her mate, you gotta nice little chariot there.
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by martinrpeachey View Post
    Wouldn't a better turbo and map turn it into a T5 any way? The older T5s are 250bhp with a smaller cc and a dull map (i know) and an S60 won't be as lairy as a S40 with with the same power due to the extra weight and wider stantz.
    I recon, after the remap, the bug may well bite .
    Above all, enjoy her mate, you gotta nice little chariot there.
    they are not the same engine mate but they do map well and pull like a steam train due to the small turbo.i had a v70 2.5lpt and standard the car would do a quater in 16.2 just after a remap it did 15.2 standard power was 193bhp and remapped power was 240bhp but more alot more torque than a t5.it was a very quick car mate

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to smithy For This Useful Post:

    M-R-P (Sunday 1st January 2012)

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    fassi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    I must say this engine loves low revs, so much torgue from standard.
    Remap should make it more fun.

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    yes yes yes lol

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts

    Red face

    Quote Originally Posted by smithy View Post
    they are not the same engine mate but they do map well and pull like a steam train due to the small turbo.i had a v70 2.5lpt and standard the car would do a quater in 16.2 just after a remap it did 15.2 standard power was 193bhp and remapped power was 240bhp but more alot more torque than a t5.it was a very quick car mate
    I meant the 2.4 block itself, being very strong (I'm presuming the block is the same?), given the right tuning they can chuck out serious horses depending on the size of bank balance and size of yer balls lol.
    Sertainly not trying to say that a remap alone isn't enough, more singing the praises of the Volvo 5 pot
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  14. #13
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    i agree with you mate but i think they are different engines mate

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to smithy For This Useful Post:

    M-R-P (Sunday 1st January 2012)

  16. #14
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts
    I was under the impression the block, head, and various other bits were the same as a t 5. I won't risk arguing about it cos I'm still a newbie and don't wanna get shot down lol.
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by martinrpeachey View Post
    I was under the impression the block, head, and various other bits were the same as a t 5. I won't risk arguing about it cos I'm still a newbie and don't wanna get shot down lol.
    to be honest mate i dont know ether and know about the 2.3 t5 and pre me7 engine boxs etc ,all i know is the 2.4t5 engine is the strongest volvo ever built.but still not as strong as a redblock though lol

  18. #16
    Senior Member
    228k and still not broke it!

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Poole, Dorset
    Posts
    23,213
    Thanks
    6,548
    Thanked 7,752 Times in 5,648 Posts
    You and your red block!, not gonna give you any grief about it 'cos It's luurvely!
    19t, greens, 3" inlet, 3" downpipe with race cat, V70R catback, autotech map...

    310.2bhp / 333ft/lb

    2016 Swedish Day UK "Best Modified Swede"
    SOLD

    Got an old discovery now.

  19. #17
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by martinrpeachey View Post
    You and your red block!, not gonna give you any grief about it 'cos It's luurvely!
    lol

  20. #18
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by martinrpeachey View Post
    You and your red block!, not gonna give you any grief about it 'cos It's luurvely!
    Even though it is a measly 136bhp.......
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  21. #19
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,472
    Thanks
    1,752
    Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,506 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bomb192uk View Post
    Even though it is a measly 136bhp.......
    137 bhp and will run for a million miles that has been proved so i know ive chose well lol

  22. #20
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smithy View Post
    137 bhp and will run for a million miles that has been proved so i know ive chose well lol
    Tell me about it, wish I had a redblock. Just found out my headgasket has gone (3rd time now)
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
ipv6 ready