280 310 remap

[S70T5Chris]

well corrected sir i was wrong on that, still a bit off 50% tho isn't it

Who said anything about 50%? And what's that got to do with the OP's question?

[S70T5Chris]

5 guests watching the thread!!! How many of them are mods!?! LOL!

Don't worry, I'll be good. Probably.

[p fandango]

Who said anything about 50%? And what's that got to do with the OP's question?

your original post implies the 20% loses is purely made up by HLM/VT to get upto the quoted figure, yet here LINK your very own car has a "measured" transmission loss of 55.2%. It may not be directly answering the OP's question, just correcting a reply

5 guests watching the thread!!! How many of them are mods!?! LOL!

we do actually get more than 5 people on this forum

[S70T5Chris]

your original post implies the 20% loses is purely made up by HLM/VT to get upto the quoted figure, yet here LINK your very own car has a "measured" transmission loss of 55.2%. It may not be directly answering the OP's question, just correcting a reply

we do actually get more than 5 people on this forum

You're really not that switched on are you!! LOL!

YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT. YOU TAKE THE PERCENTAGE AWAY FROM THE FLYWHEEL POWER. YOU REALLY ARE STRUGGLING WITH THIS AREN'T YOU?!

In reference to the link you provided to my graph there was a tranmission loss of around 30%, not 50% with your flawed mathmatics.

The twin roller setup on the Maha dyno always produces a far lower WHP rating than a single roller dyno, such as HLM's current RR and the RR they had before that one. I suspect Hamish carefully selected his dyno, based on showing a higher WHP figure than other dynos on the market.

Now if you don't have anything constructive to add, other than trying to have a dig at me, which you have failed at miserably due to your lack of intelligence, I suggest finding another topic to troll on.

[The Flying Moose]

Calm down fellas! Jesus we are getting into another bitching battle again....

[LiamT4]

You're really not that switched on are you!! LOL!

YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT. YOU TAKE THE PERCENTAGE AWAY FROM THE FLYWHEEL POWER. YOU REALLY ARE STRUGGLING WITH THIS AREN'T YOU?!

In reference to the link you provided to my graph there was a tranmission loss of around 30%, not 50% with your flawed mathmatics.

The twin roller setup on the Maha dyno always produces a far lower WHP rating than a single roller dyno, such as HLM's current RR and the RR they had before that one. I suspect Hamish carefully selected his dyno, based on showing a higher WHP figure than other dynos on the market.

Now if you don't have anything constructive to add, other than trying to have a dig at me, which you have failed at miserably due to your lack of intelligence, I suggest finding another topic to troll on.

Although your loss isn't 50% its still over 30 and by the looks of it some are getting worse.
I'm sorry but getting over 30% losses is, to be honest, ludicrous.
I'v only been to a few dyno days, but have never seen losses that high, be it twin or single rollers.


BTW, sorry for butting in, but i had to comment on those losses.

[si850r]

my god........a simple question has sparked a few rattled feathers .....

[p fandango]

In reference to the link you provided to my graph there was a tranmission loss of around 30%, not 50% with your flawed mathmatics.

correct again, give yourself 10points. With my old calculations (the wrong way lol) now binned you get 32% transmission loses

The twin roller setup on the Maha dyno always produces a far lower WHP rating than a single roller dyno, such as HLM's current RR and the RR they had before that one. I suspect Hamish carefully selected his dyno, based on showing a higher WHP figure than other dynos on the market.

I'm sure your right, Hamish must of gone all out of his way to get these certain dyno's, especially when he could quite easily rig the figures by calibrating it wrong (like any dyno can) but that would of been too easy

[p fandango]

Calm down fellas! Jesus we are getting into another bitching battle again....

i'm off to play COD & get an early night anyway now mate

[LiamT4]

my god........a simple question has sparked a few rattled feathers .....

Some questions that can cause arguments.
Panel filter or cone?
Which re-map is best?
Best brake upgrade?
How much power do you have?
and anything to do with dynos.

[T5frankie]

You're really not that switched on are you!! LOL!

YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT. YOU TAKE THE PERCENTAGE AWAY FROM THE FLYWHEEL POWER. YOU REALLY ARE STRUGGLING WITH THIS AREN'T YOU?!

In reference to the link you provided to my graph there was a tranmission loss of around 30%, not 50% with your flawed mathmatics.

The twin roller setup on the Maha dyno always produces a far lower WHP rating than a single roller dyno, such as HLM's current RR and the RR they had before that one. I suspect Hamish carefully selected his dyno, based on showing a higher WHP figure than other dynos on the market.

Now if you don't have anything constructive to add, other than trying to have a dig at me, which you have failed at miserably due to your lack of intelligence, I suggest finding another topic to troll on.

How can you slate Hamish's Dyno in overreading bhp readings when at the RR day last month most of us were disappointed at our lower than expected results especially me

[p fandango]

How can you slate Hamish's Dyno in overreading bhp readings when at the RR day last month most of us were disappointed at our lower than expected results especially me

never let facts get in the way of a good story

[S70T5Chris]

How can you slate Hamish's Dyno in overreading bhp readings when at the RR day last month most of us were disappointed at our lower than expected results especially me

LOL. You guys are funny at times.

[si850r]

Some questions that can cause arguments.
Panel filter or cone?
Which re-map is best?
Best brake upgrade?
How much power do you have?
and anything to do with dynos.

if thats the case just call me instigator ...cause i think ive posted questions about them all

[Jamest5r]

if thats the case just call me instigator ...cause i think ive posted questions about them all

So have a 100 other people mate that's why the above is getting a bit boring to be honest, but if they could step it up another level and get really abusive i might be bothered to keep reading lol.

[S70T5Chris]

So have a 100 other people mate that's why the above is getting a bit boring to be honest, but if they could step it up another level and get really abusive i might be bothered to keep reading lol.

Thats can be arranged, but i'm not sure how many warnings I have left?

[Jamest5r]

Thats can be arranged, but i'm not sure how many warnings I have left?

Better check mate don't what you getting banned, could be a long boring winter and anyway we need you to show at the 1/4miles next year cant wait for you vs p.diddy.

[S70T5Chris]

Better check mate don't what you getting banned, could be a long boring winter and anyway we need you to show at the 1/4miles next year cant wait for you vs p.diddy.

lol

[volvolised]

[quote=BruceT;345090]

Is he not the mechanic who fitted my nearside front suspension spring up side down? Then said it was it because the manufacturers writing was printed on the spring wrongly despite being a progessivly wound springs so the coils would of been closer together at one end anyway?

Bet he offered to sort it straight away if that was the case..anyways which side of the WAS is your IT going on....???????

[t5 pete]

[quote=volvolised;345239]

Bet he offered to sort it straight away if that was the case..anyways which side of the WAS is your IT going on....???????

Very true it all depends on how people sort things out and it obviously shows every one can get things wrong even when it comes down to simple things.
Also its rather sad and a very cheep shot knocking some one for a wording mistake, why not just keep on the subject.