Join Today
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    fooling the obd with no cat

    someone has removed the internals of my cat on my 2.0t but as it has 2 lambas its making it run very rich. as the post cat is sensing the same amount of emissions as the pre cat. can i fool it in anyway to think its still there. im tight and dont want to buy a new cat.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    a 19t just isn't laggy enough
    p fandango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    19,785
    Thanks
    4,216
    Thanked 5,021 Times in 4,072 Posts
    you can buy a spacer ring to move the 2nd lamba out of the air stream so it reads the lower emission levels that way & keeps the ECU happy, i've no idea where to get one from tho, sorry

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    636
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 113 Times in 101 Posts
    Alternatively, some tuners (MTE for certain) can alter the cars map so that a default value is fed to the ECU rather than the actual reading from the sensor.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    a 19t just isn't laggy enough
    p fandango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    19,785
    Thanks
    4,216
    Thanked 5,021 Times in 4,072 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Wombatbomb View Post
    Alternatively, some tuners (MTE for certain) can alter the cars map so that a default value is fed to the ECU rather than the actual reading from the sensor.
    that would work out dearer than putting the cat back in

  5. #5
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    If you're good at DIY you could fabricate a spacer ring like PF says.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    could i unplug the sensor from the exhaust n blank the hole off and then just leave the sensor plugged in under the car.

  7. #7
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    You could, but then that would have the opposite effect I guess. You could try it, theres no harm in trying.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    a 19t just isn't laggy enough
    p fandango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    19,785
    Thanks
    4,216
    Thanked 5,021 Times in 4,072 Posts
    if you unplug it the ECU will know the circuit isn't complete & throw a 2nd lamba missing/signal absent fault instead

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    636
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 113 Times in 101 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bomb192uk View Post
    You could, but then that would have the opposite effect I guess. You could try it, theres no harm in trying.
    Just taking the sensor out of the exhaust doesn't work, from the way I understand it the ECU is a bit too clever. It expects there to be some emissions detected at the second O2 sensor, if it detects none at all it thinks the sensor is broken and throws a CEL.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    nobananas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,111
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 528 Times in 448 Posts
    Hmm, interesting. All the vehicles I've worked on the post Lambda sensor doesn't affect the fueling. All it has done is triggered a MIL with a 'catalytic converter outside of limit threshold' fault code or similar. I'd then do an emission test to determine whether there is a cat fault or whether the fault is with the pre or post Lambda. I guess Volvos must use the post cat sensor as a necessary input then, will have to watch that if I get an Ovlov in with those sort of issues then.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    the front lamba reads between 1 and 3 volts as does the rear lamba sensor.

    is it likely to be causing damage to the car running like this. it drives fine just got the eml on. i checked the pre lamba and its coloured white. would this mean running lean. as the tailpipe is very black indicaring rich running?


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
ipv6 ready