Join Today
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: T5 vs 2.5T

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    Hallsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts

    T5 vs 2.5T

    Apart from the engine, what other differences are there between a T5 and a 2.5T (V70 if it matters).

    Does the T5 have different suspension (uprated, lower?), different g/box, different options?

    Is anything different cosmetically, I can't notice anything to my untrained eye!!

  2. #2
    Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,250
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 229 Times in 169 Posts
    Are we talking about the phase 1 V70?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    Hallsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    Sorry, yes

  4. #4
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    The T5 has a 2.3 litre engine with the high pressure turbo with around 240bhp. The 2.5T will be the 2435cc engine with a light pressure turbo with around 193bhp. The 2.3 T5 will have better tuning options as the 2.5 is thought to be a weaker engine with its larger bores, etc, etc.

    Interior trim can vary on both models (the CD model being a top spec). Gearboxes tend to be the same, or only very slight differences. And AFAIK the suspension was only lower on the R models, but I am probably wrong (someone will clarify).

    Check out this page on parkers for all the specs and options
    http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...96.aspx?page=7
    Last edited by Dangerous Dave; Thursday 26th March 2009 at 19:24.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Dangerous Dave For This Useful Post:

    Hallsy (Thursday 26th March 2009)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    Hallsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    So as I thought, the only difference is engine.

    I find it a little odd that the T5 model only really denoted an engine, it's not any different cosmetically, nor mechanically (apart from the engine), unless you go for an R model.

  7. #6
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Its not just an engine, more a hyperdrive.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Dangerous Dave For This Useful Post:

    PaulZX (Thursday 26th March 2009)

  9. #7
    Senior Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Epping, Essex
    Posts
    295
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
    94 855 T5 manual

  10. #8
    Senior Member
    Some people hate to see you
    doing well. They are losers...
    PaulZX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Skegvegas
    Posts
    1,526
    Thanks
    542
    Thanked 242 Times in 181 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bomb192uk View Post
    Its not just an engine, more a hyperdrive.
    warp factor sven

    (delibarate misspell)

    ((I'm here all week))

  11. #9
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    Colonel Bjorn: Prepare the Volvo for light speed.
    Dark Helmut: No, no, no, light speed is too slow.
    Colonel Bjorn: Light speed, too slow?
    Dark Helmut: Yes, we're gonna have to go right to ludicrous speed.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  12. #10
    Member
    This user has no status

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hallsy View Post
    So as I thought, the only difference is engine.

    I find it a little odd that the T5 model only really denoted an engine, it's not any different cosmetically, nor mechanically (apart from the engine), unless you go for an R model.
    That seems to be the way of the Volvo, everything is available as an option. I ended up buying a 2.5T as I could not find a T5 that met my requirements at the time. But the car had been spec'd up with Winter pack, Sport pack, Comfort pack, Wood pack, etc etc so much that cosmetically it was that of a high-end T5 without the abuse that all the T5's I could find had received. Add a RICA upgrade and (I know I am going to get flamed for this) performance could be close to that of a STANDARD T5, plus the smaller turbo means less lag.

    Still only get 22mpg on the journeys that I do :-(

  13. #11
    New Identity
    Back in an AWD....Oh the grip!
    Dangerous Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    8,921
    Thanks
    2,491
    Thanked 2,582 Times in 2,051 Posts
    I've got an LPT engine in mine, and its great.
    1996 Olive Green 850 AWD - Follow the Project - Forged rods, 19T, big blue injectors, 960 TB, 3.25" MAF, Ostrich, 608 binary, arduino data display, active exhaust control with Focus RS tips, 320mm front brake conversion.
    1996 Nautic Blue 850 AWD - Failed its MOT, now it's a donor for the green thing.
    2004 Sapphire Black S60 D5 - The new daily hack.

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    This user has no status
    Hallsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    That's the one thing against the LPT engine (other than lack of power), they do seem to be worse on fuel.

    I haven't given up yet Rob, just getting fed up of looking!! I'm starting to edge towards a V70 now, the slightly newer interior is swaying me. Finding myself looking at 9-5 Aero's as well


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
ipv6 ready