that would mean i could put bhp in the leaderboard then too lol
Printable View
3in maf does lean the car out more air going through the hole at a given point.i think you power figuires are good considering you are running rich but with adjustment and a 3in maf I think you will see 300whp no probs .i bet a hoot to drive in the road though and that is what counts .and no I'm not going into the dyno argue ment again .i will see what happens in the summer when I take my 940 to 4 different type dynos and see what the figuires are then .also I will not touch my car after I have tuned it on hlm rollers and then 3 other dynos too .
My figures are as follows
Engine power (measured) 324.3 bhp
Wheel power (measured) 300.4 bhp
The first two sets of figures.
http://i1067.photobucket.com/albums/...c518b1e873.jpg
Well done Frankie, top result. what mpg do you get on the road? does it seem like its running rich?
You have to use the corrected figures for the engine power and torque. There is no such thing as 'measured' flywheel power, its a calculation done by the dyno. The corrected power figure is the final calculation done by the dyno, and that is the valid figure.
You only have a corrected torque figure, and the graph displays the corrected engine power and torque, they are the relevant figures. The whp figure on this dyno are as useless as the ones on a maha, but the oppsoite. We've all been around long enough to know roughly what mods will produce what power, and the fhp figures seems reasonable to me. You can't possibly think that 310bhp (or even 324bhp, which isn't even the valid figure) is 300whp. Judges whp was almost identical to his flywheel power for gods sake!!!!