PDA

View Full Version : Modifying FWD Volvo Gearboxes.



Wobbly Dave
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:23
I post this without positive confirmation that my 4th gearbox since transplanting in the quaiffe LSD, is possibly on its way out. I have an appointment to see a gearbox specialist (the same people who did the fit back in 2011) later this week.

This brings me to the thought that it is impossible to modify these boxes without later problems. Whilst I accept pushing them harder will limit life I am feeling a little frustrated.

Should I be looking to change to an M66 - is this any stronger? Should I go brand new & cover that?

The ford focus ST and RS appear to have better boxes?

So Hamish says the only real way to get 400+ HP is to go down the RS Focus route. I don't agree - it must be possible as our Swedish cousins seem to have it nailed.

Going to speak to Russell at RT Mechanics to see what they did to overcome their own challenges on the yellow peril.

Speaking to the gearbox specialist he is also of the opinion that modifying/ ramping up the power on these road boxes is putting them beyond their engineered limits.

Perhaps leaving the open diff as is - is the only way?

Jamest5r
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:31
I might be wrong but didn't the peril eat a few 3rd gears??

Volvostorm
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:33
Russ had probably where the gears would 'walk' up the layshaft and rub against each other, I'm don't know how he fixed it, but I think the gearbox layshaft was machined and fitted with shims so the gears couldn't touch.

There must be an answer, because as you said, not everyone has gone over to the M66 'box

graemewelch
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:33
your best bet is to speak to tim willams. see seems to have more exerience of highly tuned volvos than most. if i was in your shoes though dave id be very temped to do the 6 spd gearbox. after driving a s70 the other day i felt it realy did need the extra gear. itll give you the option of better clutches to. i think its a well known fact that 400 bhp is far from impossible to crack to the right set up

t5 pete
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:34
First off Dave you need to find out what is happening and what is failing with out that you will be none the wiser to what needs upgrading there is a thread on here some where with details of what Russ did im sure his internal gears were moving and actually needed some welding done inside to stop this.
Im not too much up into fwd gear boxes but I doubt there will be many if any stronger parts for our boxes they will need to be custom parts

Wobbly Dave
Monday 7th April 2014, 22:50
First off Dave you need to find out what is happening and what is failing with out that you will be none the wiser to what needs upgrading there is a thread on here some where with details of what Russ did im sure his internal gears were moving and actually needed some welding done inside to stop this.
Im not too much up into fwd gear boxes but I doubt there will be many if any stronger parts for our boxes they will need to be custom parts

I think you're right. I am just a bit miffed because I am soooo close on this build. It's just a set back & I won't know for sure until it's been looked at properly.

ExternalError
Monday 7th April 2014, 23:09
Whats colin running on his because he doesnt seem to have any issues pushing 400+bhp through it

ROZER
Monday 7th April 2014, 23:15
Whats colin running on his because he doesnt seem to have any issues pushing 400+bhp through it

I don't think the bhp is causing the problem its the torque don't think they like too much torque .

smithy
Monday 7th April 2014, 23:53
The m56 boxs ate the same as the m90 boxs internally .the problem with the m90 box is the syncro on 3rd can break so they tend to weld it on 3rd gear syncro .the m90 have been proved to take over 450bhp no probs

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 00:05
Longevity however maybe compromised.

siamblue
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 02:31
If you are dealing with Hamish and Russ,then just do that,don't always go running to Tim because he is the last option,like a lot of people do,
Funny how people won't deal with Tim in the real world,but when there are problems he becomes the man to talk to and deal with..

stribo
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 06:50
I personally would look at going for a M66 if your current 'box has gone tits up. If you do go down that route, Oblark is the man to speak to, as he's fitting one to his 850.

don kalmar union
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 07:11
The Achilles heal of the old M56 gearboxes remains the baulk rings. They are particularly vulnerably to quick movements across the gates, although I have to say it is a very rare occurrence indeed in Volvo 'tuning' communities around the world.

The later M66 gearboxes incorporate baulk rings of different design and materials to the older M56 and they will take that sort of abuse for a lot, lot longer.

I have an M56 box in my S60 racer but it has been fitted with a set of dog gears which means that it will take many hours of running in endurance races without these problems, it also incorporates a quite aggressive plate type diff. not a Gripper, fitting an LSD does not have any detrimental effect on the longevity of these boxes ..... to my knowledge. I always use Red Line oil.

These dog gear sets are the only answer as there are no synchros, but they are not really even an occasional road car option, certainly not in a car used in town daily.

As has been previously mentioned Tim Williams has the most accumulated knowledge as a Volvo specialist of running M56 boxes with high output Volvo engines and is the only informed choice for honest and considered advice and potential remedial work by a country mile, apart, that is from the owners of such high output cars themselves who have in some cases learnt much too......

Regards, Don.

don kalmar union
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 07:29
On the subject of the M66 and its installation in the Focus ST and RS. An M66 from an ST will work, you just have to make some linkage changes which Tim Williams could do.

However, the M66 from an RS will not work as it has a different casing to other M66s to accommodate the fatter driveshafts used in the RS which are also specific to the Quaiffe fitted as standard in the RS which is not a direct swap for Quaiffe's unit for all other M66s.



Don.

Nealevo
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 07:37
Dave i have a M66 gearbox available, i have all the linkages and the rear subframe/engine mount to fit our cars, i was going to fit it to my car when i thought id smashed my diff........

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 09:26
Dave i have a M66 gearbox available, i have all the linkages and the rear subframe/engine mount to fit our cars, i was going to fit it to my car when i thought id smashed my diff........

Hold that thought.

don kalmar union
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 09:43
Not to forget that a Gripper or Quaiffe for an M56 does need to have its flange altered to fit an M66....... they are two differently machined components.

Regards, Don.

Jamest5r
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 10:26
First dibs on your gripper/quaffie Dave:)

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 11:35
Major cost implication with fitting the M66 is that the quaiffe diff is different - but I guess I can probably offset the cost by selling the QDF12J

If I have to change the clutch plate and all the rest then I might as well put Don's M66 Lightened flywheel and make the whole thing up.

This is not intended any longer as a daily driver - but occasion long distance road use, track days & quarters.

I think the change to the M66 with all the ancillary costs may well be prohibitive.

deathrider311271
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 18:33
Dave talk to Tim Williams will you. Do you have a problem with Tim?????? or is it just advice you have a problem with???

deathrider311271
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 18:54
I post this without positive confirmation that my 4th gearbox since transplanting in the quaiffe LSD, is possibly on its way out. I have an appointment to see a gearbox specialist (the same people who did the fit back in 2011) later this week.

This brings me to the thought that it is impossible to modify these boxes without later problems. Whilst I accept pushing them harder will limit life I am feeling a little frustrated.

Should I be looking to change to an M66 - is this any stronger? Should I go brand new & cover that?

The ford focus ST and RS appear to have better boxes?

So Hamish says the only real way to get 400+ HP is to go down the RS Focus route. I don't agree - it must be possible as our Swedish cousins seem to have it nailed.

Going to speak to Russell at RT Mechanics to see what they did to overcome their own challenges on the yellow peril.

Speaking to the gearbox specialist he is also of the opinion that modifying/ ramping up the power on these road boxes is putting them beyond their engineered limits.

Perhaps leaving the open diff as is - is the only way?

this one sentence shows how little your so called tuner actually knows, its not bhp that kills gearboxes or clutches its torque.
400bhp isnt a problem for the box ASK TIM

T5frankie
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:06
this one sentence shows how little your so called tuner actually knows, its not bhp that kills gearboxes or clutches its torque.
400bhp isnt a problem for the box ASK TIM

daves car has no torque lol

Jamest5r
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:08
I think daves just been unlucky with gearboxes as he runs very little torque compared to some, yes my m59 ate itself but the 2.0L box is coping with 410 lb/ft quite happily at the moment :) (famous last words lol)

Jamest5r
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:09
Frankie beat me to it lol

S70T5Chris
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:22
That is a laughable statement, you have to agree with DR on that one!

Not many people opt for breaking through the 400bhp barrier, simply because the cost in jumping from 350 to 400+bhp is pretty huge if it's done properly and reliably. And in all fairness in the real world, is 400bhp in a fwd Volvo much faster than a 350bhp fwd Volvo?? Apart from a motorway blast, not really, if anything it's probably less driveable. Anything is achievable with the right amount of money and knowledge. Unfortunately I believe Darth Cabl... (hang on, I'll get told off for that), Mr L doesn't have enough of the latter to achieve what you want to end up with Dave, hence that pathetic 'get out' comment!

Many people running decent power (including the likes of Steve and Tim with well over 400bhp) have run M56's with an LSD, and afaik never had a problem. One thing to mention is, Quaife LSD's are not all equal. There is a quite a big variation in how effective they are, being a mechanical type diff that is built, fit and forget they are not all 'exactly' the same. The Quaife diff I had in my S70 was leagues ahead of the same diff Steve had in his V70 for example. I will be opting for an M56 and a Gripper in my 850.

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:24
this one sentence shows how little your so called tuner actually knows, its not bhp that kills gearboxes or clutches its torque.
400bhp isnt a problem for the box ASK TIM

That remark has been taken completely out of context! It was a figure of my own speech & not a direct quote - so I don't see how this point is in anyway constructive or even accurate. Given that power is a mathematical consequence of torque there is a direct correlation, to be honest I'd rather not get into tit-4-tat exchange over my tuner's better than yours :P

I think he was more intonating towards the RS gearbox being more capable given that it was designed to take more punishment from the outset & as a whole they are just newer.

Still don't want one.

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:37
It might surprise people to know that I don't agree with everything Mr. L says. I raised this thread to gauge opinion on which possible route to reliability I may take. The current box has had its fair share of abuse - so who can say.

cherry1809
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:40
Have a look up at the Hotwok Nissan Cherry (now putting together a purpose built space framed Juke with the same set up)
Afaik he ran/runs a modified Volvo box' and I think, at the minute at least holds the current Euro fwd drag record :)
Not sure on torque but nigh on a 1000hp. He has broke boxes, but at what ever spec he's running with less than half the power it should last forever :)

deathrider311271
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 19:48
That remark has been taken completely out of context! It was a figure of my own speech & not a direct quote - so I don't see how this point is in anyway constructive or even accurate. Given that power is a mathematical consequence of torque there is a direct correlation, to be honest I'd rather not get into tit-4-tat exchange over my tuner's better than yours :P

I think he was more intonating towards the RS gearbox being more capable given that it was designed to take more punishment from the outset & as a whole they are just newer.

Still don't want one.

If it is mathematical as you say why has the torque on my S70 been limited by the map??? and before you ask yes it is a custom map, no i wasnt getting into a tit for tat about tuners, everyone has their own mind when it comes to tuners, for me AET motorsport for my ME7 car, Tim and Ben for my motronic 4.4.

Im not slating Hamish in any way but we all know he isnt really interested in doing custom maps, all he wants to do is reflash work and normal mechanics. For that reason alone i would be looking at other options.

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 20:02
of course it's mathematical. Brake Horse Power is the mathematical product of torque (in ft lbs) times the RPM divided by 5252.

if I have misread what you're saying then accept my apologies - it is too easy to mis-interpret the written word on forums.

TBH I wasn't looking for lots of torque low down either & to date my maps have not been torque mad - so I am pleased that you have a responsible mapper who's tried to look after your car.

I am hoping that we'll be able to use the SBC to raise the boost further up the rev range to help maintain the torque curve right through. I have no planned power figure.

smithy
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 21:30
of course it's mathematical. Brake Horse Power is the mathematical product of torque (in ft lbs) times the RPM divided by 5252.

if I have misread what you're saying then accept my apologies - it is too easy to mis-interpret the written word on forums.

TBH I wasn't looking for lots of torque low down either & to date my maps have not been torque mad - so I am pleased that you have a responsible mapper who's tried to look after your car.

I am hoping that we'll be able to use the SBC to raise the boost further up the rev range to help maintain the torque curve right through. I have no planned power figure.

Stick a n/a box in it then you will have more power in the road than being left in the gearbox .and it will change the power curve a lot too .with your quaffe in a n/a box and with your 7.5krpm rev limit you will still hit 160mph too .but my god will it be quick and they are cheap as chips too and not worn like the t5 boxes too.and what you are using the car for track and drag the ratios would be wild .

WOODY T5
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 21:45
Don't know wot box I have but it works well with its gripper tho on and off the track or 1/4 mile

Wobbly Dave
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 21:48
Stick a n/a box in it then you will have more power in the road than being left in the gearbox .and it will change the power curve a lot too .with your quaiffe in a n/a box and with your 7.5krpm rev limit you will still hit 160mph too .but my god will it be quick and they are cheap as chips too and not worn like the t5 boxes too.and what you are using the car for track and drag the ratios would be wild .

Interesting idea.

claymore
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 21:49
I also have the torque limited on mine, to protect the box, but I have an m59.

graemewelch
Tuesday 8th April 2014, 21:52
Don't know wot box I have but it works well with its gripper tho on and off the track or 1/4 mile


if or when if i uprate my box it will be with a gripper diff.

Wobbly Dave
Wednesday 9th April 2014, 00:25
See my build thread - but I think I have fixed it/ found the problem. Wobbly can't do up his nuts properly LOL

Wobbly Dave
Wednesday 9th April 2014, 00:29
Have a look up at the Hotwok Nissan Cherry (now putting together a purpose built space framed Juke with the same set up)
Afaik he ran/runs a modified Volvo box' and I think, at the minute at least holds the current Euro fwd drag record :)
Not sure on torque but nigh on a 1000hp. He has broke boxes, but at what ever spec he's running with less than half the power it should last forever :)

PS I did look it up - http://www.woken.se/wok/2005/3_gearbox_e.htm - back in 2005 they used a M56H modified with a multiplate clutch and a quaife LSD.

graemewelch
Wednesday 9th April 2014, 16:09
See my build thread - but I think I have fixed it/ found the problem. Wobbly can't do up his nuts properly LOL


You dope

Wobbly Dave
Wednesday 9th April 2014, 16:38
Spoke too soon - noise is back & this time the exhaust dp remained clear :cry: