View Full Version : Please tell me this is wrong and there's a fix
c70geoff
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 21:50
Plain and simple
1999 2.4 lpt c70 me7 auto
£30 in tank
Regular driving 64.2 mile return from it
That can't be right
JamesT5
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 21:52
That's about 12 - 15mpg judging by my own consumption of about £12 - £15 a day return to get to work and I do around 25 mpg for that.
merc85
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 21:54
£1.40 per ltr unleaded super £28 would get 20 ltrs, which is 4.44 gallons, so if your doing 20 mpg that will get you aprox 85 miles, id say summit is wrong
p fandango
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 21:56
12.2mpg, thats not right. My 328 got 135miles to £30 (25.7mpg)
c70geoff
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:00
Knew it was crap but what things can I play with to try sort fellas
merc85
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:03
I'd say you have a leak,
Check, Injector seals, Fuel pressure regulator under the rail, Fuel filter under car they can rust through, Fuel tank pipes, filler neck (metal clamp) can rot through. Vac leak on the manifold Purge valve from charcoal cansiter, canister itself. fuel return hose/vacum to tank. condition of the plugs. Stupid question is the auto box getting into top gear?
JamesT5
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:03
Knew it was crap but what things can I play with to try sort fellas
Injector refurb, perhaps you have a MAF fault or another sensor so the engine is over fuelling. A session on Vida might be useful!
foammanmark
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:04
My manual C70 me7 T5 gives me upto 35mpg, and never less than 28-30 even when driven sportingly. Can't see the auto making such a big difference.
p fandango
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:04
Knew it was crap but what things can I play with to try sort fellas
even tho it might not be throwing a cel light, read the codes. Also might be worth looking at changing the fuel filter
c70geoff
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:07
I'm not loosing fuel as in leak but seem to be burning or over fuelling
New maf on there no codes when read yesterday as for top gear not sure as I don't have time to get that far from home but doesn't like changing up or down when struggling sometimes
merc85
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:09
is the temp gauge reading correclty? 3 oclock position could also be a o2 sensor,
c70geoff
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:15
Temp gauge is mostly slightly under 3 oclock
siamblue
Tuesday 1st April 2014, 22:15
O2 sensor mate,get the number and i will see if i have one here,my auto AWD used to get 16 around town,but even if yours was a cabriolet which are heavy,then that is still using too much fuel..
M-R-P
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 07:24
Geoff, are you running blues still?
c70geoff
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 08:54
No mate put the orange back in to try get better mpg lol
V70 Graham
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 08:58
O2 sensors do play havock with economy but if it's that low is say a leak somewhere.
partsforvolvos.com
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 09:00
i would change the thermostat and sensor in the housing.
if the gauge is low, that sensor does the guage and ecu so it could effect fuelling.
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 09:11
Try a piece of cardboard down the front of the radiator, cheaper than a thermostat :)
JamesT5
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 09:17
Try a piece of cardboard down the front of the radiator, cheaper than a thermostat :)
:hihi: Sorry, I had to laugh.
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 09:24
:hihi: Sorry, I had to laugh.
well it was meant in jest. I did the same for years with my 440 in Norway. It does help with warm up so will improve the mpg until the 'stat is replaced if that is the problem :)
c70geoff
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 10:02
Lol thermostat and housing changed a few months ago
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 10:53
Lol thermostat and housing changed a few months ago
As said above could be the 02 sensor. My Volvo 460 auto had a cheapo one and was doing well under 20 mpg
partsforvolvos.com
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 11:05
Try a piece of cardboard down the front of the radiator, cheaper than a thermostat :)
somebody has been watching ice road truckers ....... lol
960kg
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 11:25
My 960 only returned 10mpg when an O2 sensor went wrong and i had the error code up also with black smoke out the back!
Owners do not realise that just because an error code does not come up that all is well.......O2 sensors do wear and become not very good at there job resulting in poor mpg......the manufacturers of them state a mileage of between 60 to 100,00...........my 960 went kaput at 103,000.
Get the codes read first!
T5frankie
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 11:37
You can easily get 12mpg if you're just pottering around town or your local neighbourhood especially in an auto
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 11:40
You can easily get 12mpg if you're just pottering around town or your local neighbourhood especially in an auto
Maybe in an X5!
JamesT5
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 11:57
My 960 only returned 10mpg when an O2 sensor went wrong and i had the error code up also with black smoke out the back!
Owners do not realise that just because an error code does not come up that all is well.......O2 sensors do wear and become not very good at there job resulting in poor mpg......the manufacturers of them state a mileage of between 60 to 100,00...........my 960 went kaput at 103,000.
Get the codes read first!
Might be worth changing mine because my fuel economy is slowly getting worse. Thing is there are two lambda sensors on the P2 and they're around £100+ each!
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 12:16
Might be worth changing mine because my fuel economy is slowly getting worse. Thing is there are two lambda sensors on the P2 and they're around £100+ each!
If they bring the fuel economy up by 5 mpg they would pay for themselves in 4000 miles :) smart arse answer I know sorry but just saying worth doing
RollingThunder
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 12:34
Might be worth changing mine because my fuel economy is slowly getting worse. Thing is there are two lambda sensors on the P2 and they're around £100+ each!
IIRC the front one is the one that matters - the second one only checks that the cat is working? I may be wrong but thats my recollection, so if correct you should only need to change the front one.
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 12:47
IIRC the front one is the one that matters - the second one only checks that the cat is working? I may be wrong but thats my recollection, so if correct you should only need to change the front one.
I think you need both tbh, but yes the front one does most of the work
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=8600
T5frankie
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 13:16
Maybe in an X5!
That x5 was really economical mate up to 48mpg
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 13:22
That x5 was really economical mate up to 48mpg
I had a Range Rover with the 2.7 TD engine - it was crap struggled to crack 25 mpg
24391
stribo
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 13:26
I think you need both tbh, but yes the front one does most of the work
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=8600
As RT said, only the front one will affect the fuel consumption.
jamesy12345
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 13:53
As RT said, only the front one will affect the fuel consumption.
I was just trying to say I wouldn't leave a defective rear one in
c70geoff
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 14:33
O2 sensor =
Ouch much £243 local stealer
M-R-P
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 15:10
O2 sensor =
Ouch much £243 local stealer
Have a word with Jamie at PFV, I think the one he sold Graham was less than 90 quid.
siamblue
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 18:08
Have you got a part number yet?
c70geoff
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 20:23
Not yet dude haven't been near it today been working on my business planning
pillapow
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 23:01
i would change the thermostat and sensor in the housing.
if the gauge is low, that sensor does the guage and ecu so it could effect fuelling.
It will 99% be this, the car isnt getting upto temp so is running cold and rich hence your poor MPG.
Stat and sensor should cure it.
pillapow
Wednesday 2nd April 2014, 23:04
Lol thermostat and housing changed a few months ago
One of them is faulty, test the resistance!!
c70geoff
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:10
Front 02 sensor volvo code 8627750
Bosch code 0 258 007 070
Anyone got one hanging around cheap please
siamblue
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:16
Let me look in my spares bag,i have about 4 but i know some are the same,how many wires are on yours?also is it a LSH25?
text me might be quicker i can get it out to you today.
siamblue
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:25
Well out of the 7 i have here none are the same as yours,yours is the LS-4.21
jamesy12345
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:28
Any good?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2001-VOLVO-S60-V70-2-3-TURBO-T5-LAMBDA-SENSOR-0-258-007-070-/121322687935?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item1c3f654dbf#ht_1833wt_1033
timbo
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:48
Get a Bosch front one from your local motor factors(rear one not as important), should cost about £100, if you cant fit it yourself get an independent to do it for an hours labour? My front one went and economy was terrible! Don't get a second hand one either! False economy, do it right first time!
merc85
Thursday 1st May 2014, 07:49
Let me look in my spares bag,i have about 4 but i know some are the same,how many wires are on yours?also is it a LSH25?
text me might be quicker i can get it out to you today.
Its a 5 wire sensor peeps
c70geoff
Thursday 1st May 2014, 12:46
Cheers anyways guys much appreciated
deathrider311271
Thursday 1st May 2014, 19:54
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/New-Bosch-Lambda-Sensor-Oxygen-Sensor-5-terminal-for-Volvo-0258007070-/331179037789?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item4d1bcf145d
correct one brand new
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.