PDA

View Full Version : S60R engine in a 850



oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:32
Does or has anyone fitted a S60R engine in a 850 ??

I no the S60R engine has VVT but the 850 doesn`t so is it a case of not using the VVT ??

stribo
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:42
TBH if you're just going to use the bottom end, then you'd be better off with a 2.4, as the liners are thicker. Nick MRP's engine whilst he's not looking.;)

oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:45
TBH if you're just going to use the bottom end, then you'd be better off with a 2.4, as the liners are thicker. Nick MRP's engine whilst he's not looking.;)

The 2.4 engine is the same as the 2.5 the only difference is the 2.4 has a 90mm stroke and the 2.5 has a 93.2mm stroke.

stribo
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:49
so why do 2.5 liners split and 2.4's don't?

oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:51
so why do 2.5 liners split and 2.4's don't?

Good question :)

stribo
Sunday 20th January 2013, 10:57
going back to the original question, you do lose some performance without VVT, as we found when ours packed up, butI suppose if you use higher lift cams, or port and polish the head, you may be able to compensate for it.

smithy
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:01
Good question :)

Heat and I think the 2.4 has thicker sleaves too.put a bigger turbo on the 2.5 no problems .

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:06
I have a s60 head on my new engine with the vvt deleted, solid lifters, ported and polishes and fernier adjustable camshafts on a 2.4 s60r bottom end.

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:09
you'll need the middle front engine mount from the picture, can't remember what its off

http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy196/pedro-fandango/Volvo/diagrams%20-%20info/fittinganRNengineleftoriginalbodgedmiddleP80-RNperfectrightRNwontfit.jpg

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:14
you'll need the middle front engine mount from the picture, can't remember what its off

http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy196/pedro-fandango/Volvo/diagrams%20-%20info/fittinganRNengineleftoriginalbodgedmiddleP80-RNperfectrightRNwontfit.jpg

Like this :)

http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u258/claymore2k/20130114_155352.jpg

oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:16
I have a s60 head on my new engine with the vvt deleted, solid lifters, ported and polishes and fernier adjustable camshafts on a 2.4 s60r bottom end.

Why not just put a ported/polished 850 head on a S60R bottom end ??

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:24
i've got one somewhere, but can't remember where i put it lol

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:27
Why not just put a ported/polished 850 head on a S60R bottom end ??
Smaller valve stems for one thing, and I assume a better flowing design as it's 10 years more modern than the 850 head.

oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:33
I was under the impression the valves are the same size on both heads

The only difference was the VVT.

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:38
I was under the impression the valves are the same size on both heads

The only difference was the VVT.
nope

oblark
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:41
nope

I take it I was wrong then :)

Does the s60r head have bigger valves then ??

smithy
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:53
They have sliimar valve stems

smithy
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:54
I put s60r pistons and s60r rods in a 2435 block off a lpt block .

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 11:56
They have sliimar valve stems
Which is what I said :)

kfc
Sunday 20th January 2013, 14:29
why not use the complete engine, and a stand alone ecu? just a thought.

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 16:29
I have a s60 head on my new engine with the vvt deleted, solid lifters, ported and polishes and fernier adjustable camshafts on a 2.4 s60r bottom end.
what you doing about the dizzy, you going to convert to coil-on-plug or you getting the cams drilled?

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 16:34
what you doing about the dizzy, you going to convert to coil-on-plug or you getting the cams drilled?
Look carefully at the pic of the engine in the back of the mondeo ;)

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 16:45
Look carefully at the pic of the engine in the back of the mondeo ;)
next you'll be telling me i have to read everything as well lol

graemewelch
Sunday 20th January 2013, 18:02
wouldnt it just be easier to buy a s60 with the 2.4 t5 engine already in. less of a headache

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 18:10
wouldnt it just be easier to buy a s60 with the 2.4 t5 engine already in. less of a headache
But then it wouldn't be an 855

graemewelch
Sunday 20th January 2013, 20:10
But then it wouldn't be an 855

but if want a fast car then just buy a fast one in the first place. lots cheaper and can focus on other mods that help suport high power.

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 20:26
I don't think I could have bought an s60 for £350, and all the money I've spent to my car would probably just get me an average s60 which would be nowhere near as quick as my 855.

graemewelch
Sunday 20th January 2013, 20:32
but what you spent to get it as fast as it is. im not having a dig or anything. ive been there done it and regreted it. said id never mod a car again. that didnt last long though.

claymore
Sunday 20th January 2013, 20:54
but what you spent to get it as fast as it is. im not having a dig or anything. ive been there done it and regreted it. said id never mod a car again. that didnt last long though.

I suppose some people enjoy modifying their cars, while others just want a reasonably fast car to start with, I personally have always modified my cars, I can't remember any time in my driving life i didn't try to make my car go faster, be it a Trabant or a Porsche 911.

p fandango
Sunday 20th January 2013, 20:56
said id never mod a car again. that didnt last long though.
so to throw your own question back at you, why didn't you start with a more powerful/better handling model?

graemewelch
Sunday 20th January 2013, 21:17
cause i thought id didnt want more power than it came with as standard. and i love the build quality and comfort that the s60 has. i hadnt had the car 24 hrs thought and i was looking into building a sports cat and full exhaust. must admit i like to mod cars, not as much as i used to. im more intrested in fabricating one offs these days. the reason i asked the question was cause newer t5 are so selling for next to nothing these days that it could end up cheaper. but i do understand what your saying.

smithy
Monday 21st January 2013, 00:08
I could say the same thing about my 940 because the was nothing wrong with the car the first time I modded it but I'm always looking on improving the car more and more and making it faster.also it's a learning curve too and I also enjoy fabricating my own stuff ,like a one off car.

oblark
Monday 21st January 2013, 09:31
So if the only difference between the s60r head and the 850 head is the valve stems then it`s a no brainer to fit the 850 head on a s60r block then you get the best of both worlds.

claymore
Monday 21st January 2013, 09:46
So if the only difference between the s60r head and the 850 head is the valve stems then it`s a no brainer to fit the 850 head on a s60r block then you get the best of both worlds.

I wouldn't say it was a no brainer, it seems that the big HP 850s are using the post 2005 cylinder head, but it's a lot of work, so for the best compromise I would say 850 head on 2.4 block.

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 09:52
I wouldn't say it was a no brainer, it seems that the big HP 850s are using the post 2005 cylinder head, but it's a lot of work, so for the best compromise I would say 850 head on 2.4 block.
i agree, certainly wouldn't use a S60R block. I'm already using a ME7 intake manifold so going for a later head, 2.3 block with later crank

cherry1809
Monday 21st January 2013, 10:30
Thought you could get the liners shimmed to stop the splitting problem?

oblark
Monday 21st January 2013, 11:11
The 2.4 engine is the same as the 2.5 the only difference is the 2.4 has a 90mm stroke and the 2.5 has a 93.2mm stroke.


I wouldn't say it was a no brainer, it seems that the big HP 850s are using the post 2005 cylinder head, but it's a lot of work, so for the best compromise I would say 850 head on 2.4 block.

As I said at the start of this thread the 2.4 and 2.5 are the same diameter bores but different strokes.


Thought you could get the liners shimmed to stop the splitting problem?

Yes you can get the liners shimmed.

claymore
Monday 21st January 2013, 14:08
As I said at the start of this thread the 2.4 and 2.5 are the same diameter bores but different strokes.



Yes you can get the liners shimmed.
If the 2.4 and 2.5 are the same, why is the 2.4 engine considered the best for tuning?

stribo
Monday 21st January 2013, 15:30
If the 2.4 and 2.5 are the same, why is the 2.4 engine considered the best for tuning?

Now that's the million dollar question. ;)

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 16:00
so is the 2.4 block the same as the S60R, yes its got the same bore but as the stroke is 3mm different is it shorter?

oblark
Monday 21st January 2013, 16:42
The 2.4 has a 90mm stroke and the 2.5 has a 93.2mm stroke.

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 17:40
The 2.4 has a 90mm stroke and the 2.5 has a 93.2mm stroke.
3mm as i said (ok i rounded down the 0.2mm lol), but doesn't that mean its a different block

oblark
Monday 21st January 2013, 18:38
It's either done on the crank or the con rods.

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 19:06
It's either done on the crank or the con rods.
the 3.2mm less stroke is done via the crank, but what i'm trying to say is it can't really be the same block as the piston moves 3.2mm less is it further away from the top at TDC than a S60R block. Who knows if they thickened the cylinder sleeves while they were losing the 3.2mm

Dream3r
Monday 21st January 2013, 19:34
bore is 83mm on the s60r and 81mm on the 2.4 IIRC.

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 19:39
bore is 83mm on the s60r and 81mm on the 2.4 IIRC.
ah just looked thru my engine list, & yes the B5244T5 has thinner bore & longer stroke

B5244S 2435 83 90
B5244S2 2435 83 90
B5244S4 2435 83 90
B5244S5 2435 83 90
B5244S5 2435 83 90
B5244T 2435 83 90
B5244T 2435 83 90
B5244T2 2435 83 90
B5244T3 2435 83 90
B5244T5 2401 81 93.2

woz
Monday 21st January 2013, 21:52
the 3.2mm less stroke is done via the crank, but ...it can't really be the same block as the piston moves 3.2mm less is it further away from the top at TDC than a S60R block...


Not sure if it is or it isn't but shorter stroke plus longer conrods COULD put the pistons at the same height at TDC. Just a thought...W

p fandango
Monday 21st January 2013, 22:00
Not sure if it is or it isn't but shorter stroke plus longer conrods COULD put the pistons at the same height at TDC. Just a thought...W
very good point, i've only ever heard of the 139mm or 147mm rods tho. Be certainly cheaper to lengthen the rods than make a different block

cherry1809
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 10:31
I have a s60 head on my new engine with the vvt deleted, solid lifters, ported and polishes and fernier adjustable camshafts on a 2.4 s60r bottom end.

So a 2.5 R block (with the right mounts) with an 850 head would go in without too much bother?

oblark
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 12:52
So a 2.5 R block (with the right mounts) with an 850 head would go in without too much bother?

Yes :)

partsforvolvos.com
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 13:31
i am particularly liking the black pv544 with s60R/2.4T engine in this month's ppc magazine. took the owner 10 years to build but what a great job.

the article might give you some tips about this question.

oblark- are you sure about the 850 head onto a s60 r block? - i thought the r engine was the first on the narrower block , which is think from memory is either 40 or 20mm narrower.

smithy
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 13:49
i am particularly liking the black pv544 with s60R/2.4T engine in this month's ppc magazine. took the owner 10 years to build but what a great job.

the article might give you some tips about this question.

oblark- are you sure about the 850 head onto a s60 r block? - i thought the r engine was the first on the narrower block , which is think from memory is either 40 or 20mm narrower.

The s60r block is not narrower that happened when ford wanted to put the engine in the focus and it was too wide.so they narrowed it for that car and then Volvo used it in the s40/v50 because that had a focus platform.

partsforvolvos.com
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 16:19
i stand corrected then , but the narrower block is also in the s60/v70/s80 i'm sure- its just the later version. when the s40II came out, they told us on the new model course it was done for crash zone space .
maybe its from when the 2.4t became the 2.5t 2004 / 2005 ish?

smithy - get back to your 900's lol :hidesbehi

cherry1809
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 18:03
Hope not, lol.
Good timing on the thread starting up too... Lol.
Having dalhousie's S60R engine off him for mine, as mines well and truely cattled now. Plan is, unless anyone pops up with a spanner for my works - Shim the 2.5R block (might even stick forged rods in while it's in bits) ported 850 head. Anything I don't know about that will stop this?
I did ask Tim Williams and he said it's more hassle than it's worth. :(

partsforvolvos.com
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 19:54
Sounds good. Let's see who gets one together first.

S70T5Chris
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:04
Hope not, lol.
Good timing on the thread starting up too... Lol.
Having dalhousie's S60R engine off him for mine, as mines well and truely cattled now. Plan is, unless anyone pops up with a spanner for my works - Shim the 2.5R block (might even stick forged rods in while it's in bits) ported 850 head. Anything I don't know about that will stop this?
I did ask Tim Williams and he said it's more hassle than it's worth. :(

I would reconsider purchasing anything from Steve. Severe lack of morals, and would do anything and screw anyone over to make a few quid it would seem. I'm just downloading my small claims court forms as we speak...

I wouldn't use the R 2.5 block anyway mate. Seems like a lot of work for no real gain, but if you want to go down that route, use the 2.4 from a late T5. In plentyful supply, and much cheaper. No need to fit liners and no need to fit forged rods either.

claymore
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:06
I would reconsider purchasing anything from Steve. Severe lack of morals, and would do anything and screw anyone over to make a few quid it would seem. I'm just downloading my small claims court forms as we speak...

I wouldn't use the R 2.5 block anyway mate. Seems like a lot of work for no real gain, but if you want to go down that route, use the 2.4 from a late T5. In plentyful supply, and much cheaper. No need to fit liners and no need to fit forged rods either.

Ohh, that's interesting, is there a thread somewhere?

claymore
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:08
Sounds good. Let's see who gets one together first.
You mean like this :)


http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u258/claymore2k/20130117_150211-1.jpg

S70T5Chris
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:12
Ohh, that's interesting, is there a thread somewhere?

Not currently.

merc85
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:17
I would reconsider purchasing anything from Steve. Severe lack of morals, and would do anything and screw anyone over to make a few quid it would seem. I'm just downloading my small claims court forms as we speak...

I wouldn't use the R 2.5 block anyway mate. Seems like a lot of work for no real gain, but if you want to go down that route, use the 2.4 from a late T5. In plentyful supply, and much cheaper. No need to fit liners and no need to fit forged rods either.

so what year was that chris 2004 onwards??

merc85
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:34
Rrrrr lol..... found it

oblark
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 20:35
Hope not, lol.
Good timing on the thread starting up too... Lol.
Having dalhousie's S60R engine off him for mine, as mines well and truely cattled now. Plan is, unless anyone pops up with a spanner for my works - Shim the 2.5R block (might even stick forged rods in while it's in bits) ported 850 head. Anything I don't know about that will stop this?
I did ask Tim Williams and he said it's more hassle than it's worth. :(

One person idea of "more hassle than it`s worth" is another persons walk in the park.

I would fit a ported 850 head on a low mileage s60r block :)

smithy
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 21:29
The s60r 2.5 uses forged rods and pistons as standard that's what I put in my 2435 block and they are strong already.

merc85
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 21:43
The B5244t5 lumps rods are man enough, aint they?

smithy
Tuesday 22nd January 2013, 22:02
The B5244t5 lumps rods are man enough, aint they?

They are supposed to be mate ,I was just saying that the 2.5r rods are forged and so are the pistons .at the time my car was a 2.5t 1997 v70 and I decided to play with that engine abit instead of just throwing a t5 lump in it.and it went very well mate .