PDA

View Full Version : Drilled airbox



AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 17:58
Was a bit bored today and my mate popped round with his n/a 850 sporting a drilled airbox. Tried it on mine to see how it would sound but no difference whatsoever. Have a K&N panel in mine but even so,I thought there would be some sort of induction sound...........

T5arrrgghh
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 18:06
can you not hear the turbo more? spooling and either whooshing or chattering (i know its stalling but years of calling it that take time to overcome!)

i have a couple of holes well less than ten anyway and mine makes a great noise but hey i am still a kid inside so.....

i can guarantee you will have woken at least one person who will make the statement that volvo spent the gdp of a large country designing the airbox so leave it alone.

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 18:11
Mine is original and back where it should be,just thought it odd that it made no difference.

p fandango
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 18:43
Mine is original and back where it should be,just thought it odd that it made no difference.
have you still got all the sound deadening under the bonnet, that might of made the difference less noticable

callyuk
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 19:25
i dont see the point in this at all surley all you are doing is allowing more hot air into what used to be a sealed unit ducting cold air straight from outside

T5arrrgghh
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 19:47
i dont see the point in this at all surley all you are doing is allowing more hot air into what used to be a sealed unit ducting cold air straight from outside

hahaha told ya....

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 19:54
Was only a question............

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 19:59
hahaha told ya....

:uglyhamme

callyuk
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 20:24
hahaha told ya....

no no no i wasnt trying to say that at all i cant say that as i dont have the airbox myself just thought it would be better to fit a decent aftermarket induction kit with proper heat sheilding and preferably sealed air feed pipe direct into filter rather than boring holes in the origanal box hence allowing more heat soak from the engine.

T5arrrgghh
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 20:49
too true but then which one... is the bsr any good?

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 20:55
can you not hear the turbo more? spooling and either whooshing or chattering (i know its stalling but years of calling it that take time to overcome!)

i have a couple of holes well less than ten anyway and mine makes a great noise but hey i am still a kid inside so.....

i can guarantee you will have woken at least one person who will make the statement that volvo spent the gdp of a large country designing the airbox so leave it alone.

Nothing mate,the damned thing is silent!!

Torch S70R
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 20:57
after the remap my turbo is much louder when spooling up (in a good way)
r u running std recirc valve?

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 21:00
You mean bcs? All standard bud.

Torch S70R
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 21:03
is that the 15g turbo on there ?

AlanG
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 21:31
It's standard so I expect it will be.

ahhpigsy
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 22:03
I had a drilled box on mine, was like it when I bought it. It was heavily drilled and did sound good but the heat soak was so bad it would stall if stuck in traffic say on a motorway after hoofing it, sealed it all up and runs perfect now. It's a trade off!

Big Pete
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 22:18
I have BSR induction kit and sounds amazing!

woz
Tuesday 12th May 2009, 23:25
I would love to have a drilled airbox, but since it would make my car go SLOWER I wont bother thanks, regardless of how much Volvo spent on designing it or how litte it costs to get my leccy drill out.
W

p fandango
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 00:49
I would love to have a drilled airbox, but since it would make my car go SLOWER I wont bother thanks, regardless of how much Volvo spent on designing it or how litte it costs to get my leccy drill out.
W
i find it pretty amusing that people seem to think the standard intake/airbox must be the best "because if its good enough for Volvo to fit it then it must be good", yet seem quite happy to spend money wiping over Volvo's hardwork/expertise when it comes to the engine management. I'll admit its a pretty good system compared to alot of standard intakes i've seen, but think it can easily be better'd :dgrin:

yellowt5r
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 01:03
in what way can it be made better?, performane panel filter installed into the standard box is just as good if not better than any other set up

p fandango
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 04:28
in what way can it be made better?, performane panel filter installed into the standard box is just as good if not better than any other set up
from a totally standard system first you've got the snow cap blocking air right from the beginning, the airbox altho good is not as straight flowing as it could be, the corrugated section does nothing more than disturb the air flow, the bends are too harsh etc

as i've said in a previous post, i've ran possibly 5 or 6 (if not more) different types of air filter/intake & despite the scientific info against them my fastest 1/4mile time was with an open cone filter. & when you think that just previous to the run the car was sat in the fire-up lane collecting the heat from the engine bay just shows to me how quickly the cold air gets in so making no difference to heat soak at all

JelT5
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 08:25
I have BSR induction kit and sounds amazing!

I'll second that!!! :smile:

T5arrrgghh
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 08:29
BSR it is then!

callyuk
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:03
has anyone got a pic of the bsr kit fitted so i can have a look at it

t5 pete
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:18
Theres one on ebay for sale i have just put a group a filter in myne and i think its brilliant also the only time the filter would really suck in hot air is when its stood also some one on here fitted the bsr kit and found there was no difference between the original and bsr so its really a waste of money the only problem with the standart air box is how it flows theres too many major bends IMHO ide just get a open filter have a look at myne in myne below.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=150344744409

PaulZX
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:20
I drilled my airbox with about 25 x 10mm holes, and it now sounds like I've got a big dump valve fitted.... not a sneezy one, but a whooshy one.... I love it....

t5 pete
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:26
Heres the bsa type
http://i595.photobucket.com/albums/tt39/t5pete/3546.jpg

Heres the one ive fitted
http://i595.photobucket.com/albums/tt39/t5pete/DSC00119.jpg

AlanG
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:33
I drilled my airbox with about 25 x 10mm holes, and it now sounds like I've got a big dump valve fitted.... not a sneezy one, but a whooshy one.... I love it....

Still wonderin' why mine was so quiet........Something to do with the K&N?

t5 pete
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 15:35
another person i know drilled his air box and didnt get any sound from it he drilled his air box on the cold side i suppose the more holes and the bigger the holes are the more sound you get

PaulZX
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 16:24
You can't see any of the holes I drilled without removing the box, and I put a cold air feed to the gap between the battery tray and the air box, to surround the area with cooler air....

People turn round to see me coming when I change gear at normal road speeds from 50 - 100 yds away...

T5arrrgghh
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 18:27
You can't see any of the holes I drilled without removing the box, and I put a cold air feed to the gap between the battery tray and the air box, to surround the area with cooler air....

People turn round to see me coming when I change gear at normal road speeds from 50 - 100 yds away...

same size holes in pretty much same places as you say. and being an auto its letting off that gets people looking but i dont have the whoosh i used to have on my old t5 i have the crazy chatter noise!

Alan i have a K&N panel in mine and did in my last T5 so who knows maybe yours is stealth equipped or some such other unexplainable mystery of magnitude!! gonna save pennies for BSR its quite sexual....

T5arrrgghh
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 18:29
is this a good setup?

http://www.partsforvolvosonline.com/product_info.php?products_id=5569

t5 pete
Wednesday 13th May 2009, 18:33
is this a good setup?

http://www.partsforvolvosonline.com/product_info.php?products_id=5569

Yeah there pretty good i think that set up is the best for closed air filter but once again it has sharp corners and bad bends

woz
Thursday 14th May 2009, 14:18
i find it pretty amusing that people seem to think the standard intake/airbox must be the best "because if its good enough for Volvo to fit it then it must be good", yet seem quite happy to spend money wiping over Volvo's hardwork/expertise when it comes to the engine management. I'll admit its a pretty good system compared to alot of standard intakes i've seen, but think it can easily be better'd :dgrin:

Pedro - I agree entirely - I just don't think hot air holes is the best way to do it FOR PERFORMANCE purposes. Sure if you want a nice noise its excellent.
I have already modded my snow cap (I wondered why it was like that) to hopefully give a ram effect. I now have a air pressure meter and will be rigging up some pitot tubes along the length of the intake tract, and also around the bonnet area to see where the gains can be made - with proof rather than supposition. When done I will sahre the results. Should be interesting.

Should be easy to debunk the "horns relocation" myth. Juries out on the holy airbox theory. The Ram effect of detail design, orientation and location of the external intake (in front of intercooler) will be an interesting exercise!
I have a misfire to fix first then we are on with it.

Also interested in the effect of fitted my Tomcat splitter on uunder bonnet pressures and effect on ducting out hot air from the engine bay.

I apreciate your comments, but I still ain't getting my drill out - I think the gains will come elsewhere.
All the best
Woz

AlanG
Thursday 14th May 2009, 17:26
same size holes in pretty much same places as you say. and being an auto its letting off that gets people looking but i dont have the whoosh i used to have on my old t5 i have the crazy chatter noise!

Alan i have a K&N panel in mine and did in my last T5 so who knows maybe yours is stealth equipped or some such other unexplainable mystery of magnitude!! gonna save pennies for BSR its quite sexual....

Makes no sense mate,was quite disappointed tbh....

p fandango
Thursday 14th May 2009, 19:47
Pedro - I agree entirely - I just don't think hot air holes is the best way to do it FOR PERFORMANCE purposes. Sure if you want a nice noise its excellent.
Hi Woz, noise didn't get me down the 1/4mile quicker ;)


I have already modded my snow cap (I wondered why it was like that) to hopefully give a ram effect.
ram effect is useless once the turbo gets on boost as its sucking in air at a higher rate than atmospheric by then anyway


I now have a air pressure meter and will be rigging up some pitot tubes along the length of the intake tract, and also around the bonnet area to see where the gains can be made - with proof rather than supposition. When done I will sahre the results. Should be interesting.
i'd be very interested in seeing any pressure results from under the bonnet, any chance you can test engine bay pressure both with & without the weatherstrip on the windscreen edge of the bonnet please :smlove2:


Should be easy to debunk the "horns relocation" myth. Juries out on the holy airbox theory. The Ram effect of detail design, orientation and location of the external intake (in front of intercooler) will be an interesting exercise!
the horn relocation mod as i understand it was to meant to lower the intercooler temperatures more than affect air pressure, the more surface area in the air stream the better theory
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/813eb7718d.jpg
i've removed the horns, the centre support & most of the front panel. Mainly to save a bit of weight. The idea of clearing the intercooler helped but doubt it will have a noticable effect

I have a misfire to fix first then we are on with it.
mine turned out to be HT leads, couldn't see any cracks/damage just turned out to be a naff set


I apreciate your comments, but I still ain't getting my drill out - I think the gains will come elsewhere.
All the best
Woz
i totally agree & wouldn't drill my own airbox (if i could find it lol) i would just replace it with a cone, my points are trying to disprove the Volvo box is the best design & that open filters (ie cone filters) will lose you power

850 t5 vs 600cc
Thursday 14th May 2009, 19:48
in what way can it be made better?, performane panel filter installed into the standard box is just as good if not better than any other set up

Well i would not go that far. The airfilter is designed with cost, performance, and emmissions laws in mind. It restricts the engine of air therefore using less fuel and making it quieter and better on the MPG and emission gases.
Volvo could of made the car with 400bhp from the factory but it would not of cost £30k new, More like £60k.
Breath in through a sponge then do it through a sieve and tell me whats easier.

woz
Thursday 14th May 2009, 22:27
Hi Woz, noise didn't get me down the 1/4mile quicker ;)


ram effect is useless once the turbo gets on boost as its sucking in air at a higher rate than atmospheric by then anyway


i'd be very interested in seeing any pressure results from under the bonnet, any chance you can test engine bay pressure both with & without the weatherstrip on the windscreen edge of the bonnet please :smlove2:


i totally agree & wouldn't drill my own airbox (if i could find it lol) i would just replace it with a cone, my points are trying to disprove the Volvo box is the best design & that open filters (ie cone filters) will lose you power

Not sure ram effect is totall useless - marginal for sure, but any increase in pressure at the atmospheric end of the pipe will mitigate the pressure loss due to poorly executed tract design. Or rather I will say "should" until I have some quantitave figures to back up the theory. I too have moved my horns, and as I did so realised that the increase in airflow with such a large x-section and low pressure differential will make no difference but looks better. Your mod has at least the nenefit of weight loss. Better flow through the IC will be better achieved by having a better intercooler core (mine has a lot of FOD damage due to no mesh protection on the main intake vent :>(

btw have you read the various articles on http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2162/printArticle.html about air flow? A good read - maybe you posted it up here originally?

I seem to remember you posted a list of bits for your Reverse IC piping - I cannot find it - would you be able to do that for me?

Cheers
W:>)

p fandango
Thursday 14th May 2009, 22:57
Not sure ram effect is totall useless - marginal for sure, but any increase in pressure at the atmospheric end of the pipe will mitigate the pressure loss due to poorly executed tract design. Or rather I will say "should" until I have some quantitave figures to back up the theory. I too have moved my horns, and as I did so realised that the increase in airflow with such a large x-section and low pressure differential will make no difference but looks better. Your mod has at least the nenefit of weight loss. Better flow through the IC will be better achieved by having a better intercooler core (mine has a lot of FOD damage due to no mesh protection on the main intake vent :>(
the looks of the intercooler without the horns in the way has got to be a good enough excuse by itself lol, especially if you've got a mesh grill


btw have you read the various articles on http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2162/printArticle.html about air flow? A good read - maybe you posted it up here originally?
no it wasn't me, thanks i'll have a read tomorrow (i give up easy so hope it doesn't get to technical)


I seem to remember you posted a list of bits for your Reverse IC piping - I cannot find it - would you be able to do that for me?
no problem mate, i'll sort it out tomorrow & PM you (or FFM might have it easier to hand)

PaulZX
Thursday 14th May 2009, 23:37
Here's the full list of bits you need, and a picture of the two pipes assembled.... Also this is presuming you're using the bigger throttle body, if not and you're leaving the standard throttle body on, you need to replace one of the 76mm 90 degree bends, with a 61mm to 76mm 90 degree reducer. The 2.25" pipes are used as couplers on the throttle body pipe.

3" Stainless piping

1 x 80mm
1 x 140mm
1 x 160mm
1 x 305mm

2.25" Steel Pipe

2 x 80mm


Silicone Bits


1 x 76mm to 61mm straight reducer
1 x 76mm to 51mm straight reducer
1 x 76mm to 56mm straight reducer
1 x 56mm to 51mm 90deg reducer
1 x 56mm 45 deg
2 x 76mm 90 deg
2 x 76mm 45 deg

Other bits

11 x 80mm Jubille Clips
7 x 65mm Jubilee Clips

1 x 19mm Air Compressor Fitting

http://i41.tinypic.com/10h16dc.jpg

JelT5
Friday 15th May 2009, 06:09
as i've said in a previous post, i've ran possibly 5 or 6 (if not more) different types of air filter/intake & despite the scientific info against them my fastest 1/4mile time was with an open cone filter. & when you think that just previous to the run the car was sat in the fire-up lane collecting the heat from the engine bay just shows to me how quickly the cold air gets in so making no difference to heat soak at all


I totally agree Pedro, my fastest 1/4 so far is with a £15 open cone filter; no heat shield etc. I've changed to the BSR set up more to tidy things up under bonnet than look for any gain in performance; never thought I'd put aesthetics in front of performance...*hangs head in shame*

My next outing on the 1/4 (next weekend- Bitburg, Germany) might show up any deficiencies in the new induction set-up; having said that, there are so many other factors that affect 1/4 mile times...:blahblah: